Wayne Hsiung is arrested at Sunrise Farms in Petaluma on May 29, 2018.
A necessity defense argues that a person committed a crime only to prevent a greater harm.
She emphasizes the decision did not create any right to trespass.
"The District Attorney’s Office respects lawful protest and the right to advocate for changes in law or policy," according to the May 1 statement. "Strong beliefs do not create a legal right to trespass, interfere with regulated industries, or take property."
"We agree with defendant that the trial court erroneously limited his presentation of evidence to the jury related to his two-prong mistake of law defense," reads the ruling.
The court also reversed his count of conspiracy to commit trespass by refusing to leave private property and his count of trespassing with intent to interfere with lawful business.
Hsiung said that taking animals from a factory farm is exercising a "right to rescue" law, akin to the legal right to break into a car to rescue a dog in hot temperatures. The organization is hoping to make legal the right of people to enter places such as a factory farm to remove animals that are being "exploited" or are in distress.
"That the court has reversed the majority of Mr. Hsiung's convictions just a matter of days after argument is a major rebuke to a trial that we have always insisted was riddled with legal and factual errors," said Justin Marceau, director of the Animal Activist Legal Defense Project at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law, who argued the appeal. "The court has notably rejected the state's argument that animals are categorically excluded from a necessity defense. This is a significant victory for animal protection and the rights of animal activists to defend them."
"At best, DxE’s public statement about the appellate decision is a misunderstanding of the law; at worst, it is a deliberate misrepresentation of the Court of Appeal’s decision," the DA's May 1 statement continues. "The Hsiung opinion addressed a narrow issue about whether a jury should be able to consider a defendant’s honest but mistaken belief about the law. They felt that the jury should have heard this information, and I respect their decision. With one conviction remaining, we will decide the best path forward after reviewing the record.”
DxE activist Zoe Rosenberg was found guilty in October 2025 of felony conspiracy and misdemeanor counts of trespassing and tampering with a vehicle for entering Petaluma Poultry -- a subsidiary of Perdue Foods -- in June 2023.
According to prosecutors, Rosenberg carefully planned out an illegal chicken heist, complete with disguises, tracking devices, stealing business records, and a safe house. According to DxE, the chickens were rescued from inhumane conditions and her trespassing was a moral imperative.
Live Radio